Abstract
Recently, Kundu et al. reported that the globular cluster NGC 5024 (M53) possesses five extra-tidal RR Lyrae. In fact, four of them were instead known members of a nearby globular cluster NGC 5053. The status of the remaining extra-tidal RR Lyrae is controversial depending on the adopted tidal radius of NGC 5024. We have also searched for additional extra-tidal RR Lyrae within an area of ∼8 deg2 covering both globular clusters. This includes other known RR Lyrae within the search area, as well as stars that fall within the expected range of magnitudes and colors for RR Lyrae (and yet outside the cutoff of two-thirds of the tidal radii of each globular cluster for something to be called extra-tidal) if they were extra-tidal RR Lyrae candidates for NGC 5024 or NGC 5053. Based on the the proper-motion information and their locations on the color–magnitude diagram, none of the known RR Lyrae belong to the extra-tidal RR Lyrae of either globular clusters. In the cases where the stars satisfied the magnitude and color ranges of RR Lyrae, analysis of time series data taken from the Zwicky Transient Facility do not reveal periodicities, suggesting that none of these stars are RR Lyrae. We conclude that there are no extra-tidal RR Lyrae associated with either NGC 5024 or NGC 5053 located within our search area.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
1. Introduction
As an ancient population that is orbiting around our Galaxy in its halo, globular clusters could leave tidal tails along their orbits. Indeed, tidal tails have already been detected in some globular clusters such as Palomar 5 (Odenkirchen et al. 2001; Rockosi et al. 2002), NGC 5466 (Belokurov et al. 2006), Palomar 1 (Niederste-Ostholt et al. 2010), Palomar 14 (Sollima et al. 2011), Palomar 15 (Myeong et al. 2017), Eridanus (Myeong et al. 2017), NGC 7492 (Navarrete et al. 2017), and M5 (Grillmair 2019). The existence of tidal tails from globular clusters were also supported from theoretical modeling and simulations (for examples, see Combes et al. 1999; Yim & Lee 2002; Dehnen et al. 2004; Capuzzo Dolcetta et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2006; Fellhauer et al. 2007; Montuori et al. 2007; Hozumi & Burkert 2015). The tidally stripped stars in the tails are preferentially low-mass stars (Combes et al. 1999; Baumgardt & Makino 2003), which could include RR Lyrae (Jordi & Grebel 2010). As low-mass high-amplitude pulsating stars, RR Lyrae can be easily identified from time domain surveys based on their characteristic light-curve shapes. RR Lyrae are precise distance indicators hence distances to the tidal tails can be constrained if the extra-tidal RR Lyrae can be found in the associated tidal tails. Furthermore, RR Lyrae are more luminous than the main-sequence stars at similar mass, hence they can be used to reveal the presence of tidal tails around distant globular clusters. In this regard, it is important and interesting to search for extra-tidal RR Lyrae associated with globular clusters. As demonstrated in Kunder et al. (2018) and Minniti et al. (2018), findings of extra-tidal RR Lyrae could be used to constrain the history of orbital motion and the dynamic processes of the parent globular clusters.
Extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars have been found around several globular clusters. Based on wide-field imaging, Fernández-Trincado et al. (2015) reported about a dozen RR Lyrae located at a distance similar to ω Centauri (NGC 5139), which are also located outside the tidal radius (rt) of this cluster. However the authors suggested that they are unlikely to be associated with the tidal debris of ω Centauri. In contrast, eight extra-tidal RR Lyrae candidates were found for NGC 6441, as their radial velocities are consistent with the cluster and they are located between 1 and 3 tidal radii from the cluster (Kunder et al. 2018). Using Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2; Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016, 2018a) data, Minniti et al. (2018) discovered that there is an excess of RR Lyrae outside the tidal radius of M62 (NGC 6266), which the authors interpreted as tidally stripped RR Lyrae while the cluster is crossing the Galactic bulge. Recently, Price-Whelan et al. (2019) found 17 RR Lyrae that most likely belong to the stellar stream of Palomar 5, with a few of them previously identified as potential members (Vivas et al. 2001; Wu et al. 2005; Vivas & Zinn 2006). An independent search of RR Lyrae in the stellar stream of Palomar 5 was also performed in Ibata et al. (2017).
In addition to the individual globular clusters, Kundu et al. (2019) performed a systematic search for extra-tidal RR Lyrae around globular clusters with Gaia DR2 data and the Gaia DR2 RR Lyrae Catalog (Clementini et al. 2019). Out of the 56 globular clusters, the authors identify 11 globular clusters possessing extra-tidal RR Lyrae based on their positions (out to three times the tidal radius of each cluster), proper motions, and locations in the color–magnitude diagrams (CMDs). Among these 11 globular clusters, six globular clusters have one extra-tidal RR Lyrae while another three clusters have two (including Palomar 5). The remaining two globular clusters, NGC 5024 and NGC 3201, were found to have 5 and 13 extra-tidal RR Lyrae, respectively. The extra-tidal RR Lyrae in NGC 5024 merit further discussion, as four of them are located on one side of the cluster at a (projected) distance near three times the tidal radius (that is, 551). This is close to a nearby globular cluster: NGC 5053 located at a projected distance of ∼577 away from NGC 5024. In fact, these four extra-tidal RR Lyrae of NGC 5024 are instead known RR Lyrae from NGC 5053 as listed in the Updated Catalog of Variable Stars in Globular Clusters (Clement et al. 2001; Clement 2017, hereafter Clement's Catalog), as illustrated in Figure 1. Hence the number of extra-tidal RR Lyrae in NGC 5024 should be reduced to one.
Since NGC 5053 is not included in the list of 56 globular clusters given in Kundu et al. (2019), it may contain additional (uncatalogued) extra-tidal RR Lyrae. Separately, we wish to ascertain whether there could be more extra-tidal RR Lyrae from NGC 5024, in addition to the one that was identified and discussed above. The goal of this work is to search for (additional) extra-tidal RR Lyrae in NGC 5024 and NGC 5053, given the close proximity of these two globular clusters in the sky. Note that based on imaging observations using the Canada–Hawaii–France Telescope, Chun et al. (2010) reported there was a tidal bridge feature between NGC 5024 and NGC 5053. However, such a tidal bridge feature was not confirmed in Jordi & Grebel (2010). Nevertheless, Jordi & Grebel (2010) found extra-tidal halos in both globular clusters, and confirmed the detection of a tidal tail for NGC 5053 reported in Lauchner et al. (2006). On the other hand, a possible tidal tail could be present for NGC 5024 (Beccari et al. 2008) but no conclusive result can be determined.
In Section 2, we compile a list of known and candidate RR Lyrae collected from the literature, and determine if any of them are extra-tidal RR Lyrae. In Section 3, we search for potential new extra-tidal RR Lyrae using Gaia DR2 data and time series data taken from the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF). The conclusion of this work is presented in Section 4.
2. Known and Candidate RR Lyrae in the Vicinity of the Clusters
The tidal radii rt of NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 were adopted from de Boer et al. (2019) as 228 ± 14 and 152 ± 33, respectively. For consistency, these tidal radii were based on the fitted spherical potential escapers stitched (SPES) model8 to the number density profile constructed from Gaia DR2 and literature data, converted from parsec to arcminute using the distances provided in Harris et al. (1996, 2010; the 2010 edition, hereafter Harris Catalog),9 where the distances to NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 are 17.9 kpc and 17.4 kpc, respectively. Because the areas enclosed by the 3rt regions for these two clusters overlapped, we defined a circle with a radius of 16, centered at (α, δ)J2000 = (198.48568, + 17.90798)° (see Figure 4), to search and identify RR Lyrae from the literature within this ∼8 deg2 area.
We collected known and candidate RR Lyrae located within this circle from various catalogs. These catalogs include Clement's Catalog (NGC 5024: 64 stars; NGC 5053: 10 stars), the catalog from the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) International Variable Star Index (VSX; Watson et al. 2006, 55 stars), and those from Sesar et al. (2017, 91 stars). The primary recent sources for RR Lyrae compiled in Clement's Catalogs are Arellano Ferro et al. (2011) for NGC 5024 and Nemec (2004) for NGC 5053, respectively. We selected all entries in Sesar et al. (2017) within the predefined circle regardless of the final classification scores S3ab and S3c, hence some of them with low scores were considered RR Lyrae candidates.10 All of the above were queried via the SIMBAD's VizieR service. We have also searched the Gaia DR2 RR Lyrae Catalog (Clementini et al. 2019, the gaiadr2.vary_rrlyrae Table; 79 stars) and RR Lyrae in the Gaia DR2 high-amplitude pulsating stars Catalog (Rimoldini et al. 2019, the gaiadr2.vari_classifier_result Table; 70 stars) via the astronomical data query language (ADQL) interface from the Gaia archive.11 We combined the query results from these two tables, using the source_id, for a total of 80 RR Lyrae from Gaia DR2 (hereafter GaiaDR2RRL catalog). Finally, we merged all of the above catalogs, using positional matching, to create a master catalog that contains 125 RR Lyrae and candidates within the circle mentioned earlier.
A further examination of these 125 RR Lyrae revealed that 29 RR Lyrae candidates do not have any counterparts in either Clement's Catalog, the VSX catalog, or the GaiaDR2RRL catalog. All of them have classification scores S3ab and S3c smaller than 0.52 in the Sesar et al. (2017) catalog, with brightness fainter than ∼18.5 mag in the r band or Gaia's G band. We believe they are either misclassified or background RR Lyrae that are unrelated to NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 (the RR Lyrae in these two globular clusters should be brighter than ∼17.5 mag in the r or G band), hence we removed them from our master catalog (a detailed investigation of them is beyond the scope of this work). The remainder of the 96 RR Lyrae in our master catalog will be divided into two groups, and analyzed with criteria similar to those outlined in Kundu et al. (2019), as presented in the following subsections.
2.1. Group A: Known Members in NGC 5024 and NGC 5053
In Table 1 we summarize the basic information for the 74 known RR Lyrae located in NGC 5024 and NGC 5053. Positions of these RR Lyrae in the CMDs are presented in Figure 2. The stars, including the extra-tidal RR Lyrae identified in Kundu et al. (2019), are undoubtedly RR Lyrae stars as they are located as expected on the horizontal branch on the CMDs of these two globular clusters. The four extra-tidal RR Lyrae that belong to NGC 5053 (green points in Figure 2), but were misidentified as members of NGC 5024, are well positioned on the horizontal branch for the NGC 5053's CMD, but shifted upward in the case of NGC 5024's CMD (due to difference in the distance of these two globular clusters). In contrast, the one remaining extra-tidal RR Lyrae of NGC 5024 fits well to the horizontal branch of NGC 5024 (cyan point in Figure 2).
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageTable 1. Known RR Lyrae in NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 (Group A)
Namea | αJ2000 | δJ2000 | Δ5024b | Δ5053b | Gaia DR2 ID | Gc | Bp − Rpc | pmRAd | pmDEd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGC 5024 V61 | 198.22967 | 18.17014 | 0.12 | 57.76 | 3938022017256098432 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 0.224 ± 0.652 | 0.351 ± 0.449 |
NGC 5024 V57 | 198.23150 | 18.16617 | 0.14 | 57.56 | 3938022017253298816 | 16.620 | −99.99 | 0.820 ± 0.549 | −3.508 ± 0.425 |
NGC 5024 V63 | 198.23454 | 18.16686 | 0.26 | 57.43 | 3937271394410272128 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 0.596 ± 0.657 | 0.233 ± 0.479 |
NGC 5024 V72 | 198.23308 | 18.16453 | 0.27 | 57.43 | 3937271394411045760 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 2.074 ± 0.339 | 0.021 ± 0.231 |
NGC 5024 V71 | 198.22658 | 18.16500 | 0.28 | 57.77 | 3938022017255714688 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −2.708 ± 0.789 | −1.737 ± 0.813 |
NGC 5024 V91 | 198.22342 | 18.17044 | 0.41 | 58.08 | 3938022017256046592 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 2.884 ± 0.445 | 1.536 ± 0.333 |
NGC 5024 V53 | 198.23263 | 18.17544 | 0.46 | 57.77 | 3938022395210336128 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −99.99 |
NGC 5024 V54 | 198.22629 | 18.17542 | 0.49 | 58.09 | 3938022017256105344 | 16.633 | −99.99 | −3.039 ± 0.587 | 5.163 ± 0.476 |
NGC 5024 V62 | 198.22500 | 18.17494 | 0.50 | 58.14 | 3938022017255910528 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 0.153 ± 0.687 | −0.421 ± 0.481 |
NGC 5024 V46 | 198.22721 | 18.17694 | 0.55 | 58.09 | 3938022017255848704 | 16.622 | 0.544 | −0.734 ± 0.288 | −1.025 ± 0.166 |
NGC 5024 V52 | 198.23300 | 18.17697 | 0.55 | 57.80 | 3938022395212860928 | 16.782 | −99.99 | 0.783 ± 0.392 | −1.968 ± 0.438 |
NGC 5024 V58 | 198.23167 | 18.15861 | 0.58 | 57.33 | 3937271394411059072 | 16.665 | 0.564 | 0.910 ± 0.345 | −0.307 ± 0.238 |
NGC 5024 V45 | 198.22983 | 18.15761 | 0.63 | 57.39 | 3937271394410013312 | 16.640 | 0.560 | −0.027 ± 0.259 | −0.525 ± 0.184 |
NGC 5024 V60 | 198.23742 | 18.16014 | 0.63 | 57.09 | 3937271394411025920 | 16.385 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −99.99 |
NGC 5024 V64 | 198.21883 | 18.17014 | 0.66 | 58.31 | 3938022017255783424 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −2.644 ± 1.265 | 1.637 ± 0.863 |
NGC 5024 V55 | 198.22275 | 18.17683 | 0.67 | 58.30 | 3938022085972624768 | 16.484 | −99.99 | 0.001 ± 0.253 | −0.828 ± 0.144 |
NGC 5024 V56 | 198.22371 | 18.15722 | 0.75 | 57.69 | 3937271360050576512 | 16.778 | −99.99 | −2.101 ± 0.442 | −3.017 ± 0.257 |
NGC 5024 V92 | 198.22879 | 18.18064 | 0.75 | 58.12 | 3938022395213189248 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −1.276 ± 0.402 | −1.295 ± 0.238 |
NGC 5024 V59 | 198.23608 | 18.15578 | 0.82 | 57.03 | 3937271394411208192 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 0.108 ± 0.638 | −2.325 ± 0.489 |
NGC 5024 V44 | 198.21525 | 18.16683 | 0.86 | 58.39 | 3938021982896346240 | 16.718 | 0.470 | −0.399 ± 0.235 | −2.076 ± 0.129 |
NGC 5024 V51 | 198.23996 | 18.18047 | 0.92 | 57.56 | 3938022395210481408 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 1.433 ± 0.235 | −0.515 ± 0.135 |
NGC 5024 V43 | 198.22117 | 18.18208 | 0.98 | 58.54 | 3938022085975189504 | 16.664 | 0.580 | 0.285 ± 0.225 | −0.592 ± 0.164 |
NGC 5024 V31 | 198.24821 | 18.16803 | 1.03 | 56.78 | 3937271772365640960 | 16.608 | 0.605 | −0.807 ± 0.186 | −1.311 ± 0.128 |
NGC 5024 V41 | 198.23646 | 18.18569 | 1.11 | 57.89 | 3938022395210877312 | 16.760 | 0.378 | 0.203 ± 0.180 | −1.318 ± 0.119 |
NGC 5024 V42 | 198.21058 | 18.17225 | 1.15 | 58.78 | 3938022051615475712 | 16.640 | 0.621 | −2.918 ± 0.340 | −1.781 ± 0.190 |
NGC 5024 V37 | 198.21783 | 18.18483 | 1.22 | 58.78 | 3938022085972862848 | 16.693 | 0.622 | −0.247 ± 0.168 | −1.229 ± 0.115 |
NGC 5024 V09 | 198.25029 | 18.15697 | 1.33 | 56.35 | 3937271321396679936 | 16.777 | 0.632 | −0.447 ± 0.193 | −1.355 ± 0.144 |
NGC 5024 V18 | 198.20250 | 18.17033 | 1.58 | 59.13 | 3938022047320224768 | 16.822 | 0.406 | −0.580 ± 0.312 | −1.941 ± 0.217 |
NGC 5024 V08 | 198.25171 | 18.18475 | 1.58 | 57.11 | 3938022429571836288 | 16.772 | 0.534 | 0.858 ± 0.320 | −1.812 ± 0.191 |
NGC 5024 V40 | 198.23276 | 18.19852 | 1.83 | 58.46 | 3938022498291497088 | 16.843 | 0.354 | −0.051 ± 0.166 | −1.600 ± 0.113 |
NGC 5024 V07 | 198.25363 | 18.19165 | 1.94 | 57.23 | 3938022429572023424 | 16.844 | 0.562 | 0.440 ± 0.221 | −1.190 ± 0.166 |
NGC 5024 V24 | 198.19700 | 18.15900 | 1.97 | 59.09 | 3938021948535632768 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −0.077 ± 0.168 | −1.389 ± 0.110 |
NGC 5024 V06 | 198.26630 | 18.17220 | 2.07 | 56.01 | 3937271733713546624 | 16.706 | 0.614 | 0.027 ± 0.229 | −1.650 ± 0.160 |
NGC 5024 V25 | 198.26841 | 18.17703 | 2.24 | 56.05 | 3937271733710749056 | 16.720 | 0.544 | −0.176 ± 0.192 | −1.622 ± 0.147 |
NGC 5024 V23 | 198.25978 | 18.14332 | 2.25 | 55.49 | 3937271119532519808 | 16.772 | 0.430 | −0.397 ± 0.242 | −2.690 ± 0.180 |
NGC 5024 V32 | 198.19893 | 18.14327 | 2.33 | 58.56 | 3938021841161792640 | 16.758 | 0.451 | −0.008 ± 0.159 | −1.517 ± 0.121 |
NGC 5024 V10 | 198.19053 | 18.18207 | 2.41 | 60.06 | 3938022253478651392 | 16.722 | 0.478 | −0.327 ± 0.175 | −1.294 ± 0.115 |
NGC 5024 V38 | 198.23812 | 18.12791 | 2.46 | 56.15 | 3937270977799285376 | 16.714 | 0.597 | −0.646 ± 0.159 | −1.428 ± 0.104 |
NGC 5024 V03 | 198.21410 | 18.12926 | 2.51 | 57.41 | 3937271149597965312 | 16.818 | 0.493 | −0.341 ± 0.153 | −1.174 ± 0.107 |
NGC 5024 V29 | 198.26779 | 18.14637 | 2.51 | 55.17 | 3937271497489647616 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −0.482 ± 0.177 | −1.250 ± 0.128 |
NGC 5024 V11 | 198.18912 | 18.15054 | 2.57 | 59.25 | 3938021909878970752 | 16.765 | 0.533 | −0.151 ± 0.173 | −1.178 ± 0.118 |
NGC 5024 V47 | 198.21008 | 18.20686 | 2.59 | 59.83 | 3938022738809664000 | 16.742 | 0.372 | −0.245 ± 0.174 | −1.042 ± 0.130 |
NGC 5024 V33 | 198.18278 | 18.17024 | 2.71 | 60.12 | 3938022154692482944 | 16.729 | 0.673 | 0.086 ± 0.179 | −1.397 ± 0.126 |
NGC 5024 V01 | 198.23478 | 18.12049 | 2.87 | 56.12 | 3937270982093531648 | 16.770 | 0.518 | 0.249 ± 0.169 | −1.560 ± 0.114 |
NGC 5024 V19 | 198.27926 | 18.15730 | 2.87 | 54.92 | 3937271531849398400 | 16.802 | 0.434 | −0.111 ± 0.187 | −1.393 ± 0.143 |
NGC 5024 V35 | 198.26011 | 18.21047 | 3.06 | 57.50 | 3938022567010985984 | 16.824 | 0.446 | −0.374 ± 0.182 | −1.167 ± 0.139 |
NGC 5024 V02 | 198.20952 | 18.11687 | 3.30 | 57.31 | 3937269676423468672 | 16.788 | 0.372 | −0.609 ± 0.194 | −1.337 ± 0.116 |
NGC 5024 V04 | 198.18288 | 18.12395 | 3.78 | 58.87 | 3938020367987656320 | 16.800 | 0.432 | 0.191 ± 0.163 | −1.351 ± 0.106 |
NGC 5024 V17 | 198.16807 | 18.19833 | 3.98 | 61.66 | 3938023082407017088 | 16.806 | 0.465 | 0.244 ± 0.170 | −1.226 ± 0.113 |
NGC 5024 V16 | 198.19250 | 18.11085 | 4.06 | 58.04 | 3937269642063727360 | 16.871 | 0.345 | −0.195 ± 0.170 | −1.423 ± 0.122 |
NGC 5024 V27 | 198.17261 | 18.12322 | 4.25 | 59.38 | 3938020333627916928 | 16.723 | 0.593 | −0.515 ± 0.154 | −1.178 ± 0.109 |
NGC 5024 V34 | 198.19045 | 18.10722 | 4.30 | 58.05 | 3937269642063726080 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −0.123 ± 0.174 | −1.372 ± 0.125 |
NGC 5024 V36 | 198.26373 | 18.25287 | 5.43 | 58.72 | 3939524087576094848 | 16.825 | 0.413 | −0.065 ± 0.186 | −1.354 ± 0.144 |
NGC 5024 V15 | 198.30162 | 18.23205 | 5.59 | 56.23 | 3939523915777402368 | 16.847 | 0.364 | −0.511 ± 0.197 | −1.091 ± 0.164 |
NGC 5024 V05 | 198.16285 | 18.09508 | 5.83 | 59.19 | 3937269573344246528 | 16.725 | 0.577 | −0.158 ± 0.162 | −1.170 ± 0.103 |
NGC 5024 V26 | 198.14894 | 18.08894 | 6.64 | 59.78 | 3937269191089937536 | 16.753 | 0.448 | −0.278 ± 0.173 | −1.519 ± 0.113 |
NGC 5024 V20 | 198.28781 | 18.07121 | 6.68 | 52.10 | 3937269809565198720 | 16.801 | 0.449 | −0.107 ± 0.169 | −1.505 ± 0.130 |
NGC 5024 V14 | 198.33562 | 18.11195 | 6.89 | 50.79 | 3937270359321073792 | 16.784 | 0.488 | −0.016 ± 0.180 | −1.541 ± 0.154 |
NGC 5024 V28 | 198.17547 | 18.27716 | 7.25 | 63.72 | 3938026930697675648 | 16.715 | 0.506 | −0.210 ± 0.158 | −1.241 ± 0.110 |
NGC 5024 V21 | 198.35868 | 18.16208 | 7.33 | 51.20 | 3938772017327358336 | 16.818 | 0.418 | −0.586 ± 0.198 | −1.318 ± 0.150 |
NGC 5024 V12 | 198.34930 | 18.22126 | 7.50 | 53.63 | 3938773048119562496 | 16.742 | 0.511 | −0.258 ± 0.171 | −1.355 ± 0.131 |
NGC 5024 V30 | 198.25068 | 18.03440 | 8.11 | 53.16 | 3937268160297720576 | 16.824 | 0.479 | −0.182 ± 0.147 | −1.464 ± 0.116 |
NGC 5024 V13 | 198.36767 | 18.08693 | 9.23 | 48.46 | 3937267133802945024 | 16.718 | 0.497 | 0.116 ± 0.209 | −1.422 ± 0.168 |
NGC 5024 V48 | 198.30983 | 18.36777 | 12.81 | 60.85 | 3939527386110983424e | 16.800 | 0.392 | −0.085 ± 0.166 | −1.636 ± 0.117 |
NGC 5053 V10 | 199.13554 | 17.71290 | 58.45 | 1.50 | 3938494459361028992 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −0.278 ± 0.213 | −0.727 ± 0.146 |
NGC 5053 V08 | 199.14179 | 17.71116 | 58.82 | 1.78 | 3938494463656186880 | 16.620 | 0.435 | −0.367 ± 0.156 | −1.166 ± 0.105 |
NGC 5053 V04 | 199.11674 | 17.66565 | 58.91 | 2.09 | 3938493948260097024 | 16.501 | −99.99 | −0.495 ± 0.140 | −1.370 ± 0.128 |
NGC 5053 V06 | 199.14425 | 17.71869 | 58.73 | 2.11 | 3938494566735402880 | 16.695 | 0.333 | −0.192 ± 0.150 | −1.504 ± 0.108 |
NGC 5053 V03 | 199.14842 | 17.73773 | 58.43 | 3.03 | 3938682273986049792 | 16.575 | 0.537 | −0.378 ± 0.135 | −1.252 ± 0.101 |
NGC 5053 V07 | 199.08220 | 17.74399 | 54.89 | 3.16 | 3938682445784738688e | 16.549 | 0.371 | −0.318 ± 0.158 | −1.390 ± 0.106 |
NGC 5053 V02 | 199.05154 | 17.69631 | 54.77 | 3.51 | 3938681827309432448e | 16.609 | 0.460 | −0.145 ± 0.147 | −1.286 ± 0.107 |
NGC 5053 V05 | 199.17174 | 17.63628 | 62.52 | 5.10 | 3938492883108232960 | 16.513 | 0.617 | −0.330 ± 0.132 | −1.341 ± 0.101 |
NGC 5053 V01 | 198.99724 | 17.74100 | 50.73 | 7.05 | 3938682995540541440e | 16.526 | 0.545 | −0.355 ± 0.151 | −1.350 ± 0.095 |
NGC 5053 V09 | 199.04957 | 17.80299 | 51.64 | 7.15 | 3938686637672823424e | 16.523 | 0.618 | −0.377 ± 0.139 | −1.149 ± 0.092 |
Notes.
aKnown RR Lyrae adopted from Clement's Catalog. The number −99.99 means no data. bΔ represents the angular distance, in arcminutes, for a given RR Lyrae to the center of the cluster. cIntensity mean magnitudes and colors taken from the Gaia DR2 RR Lyrae Catalog (i.e., the gaiadr2.vary_rrlyrae Table). dProper motions in mas yr−1 taken from Gaia DR2 main catalog. eExtra-tidal RR Lyrae for NGC 5024 identified in Kundu et al. (2019).To further evaluate the associations of these known RR Lyrae to the two globular clusters, we compared their proper motions with the measured proper motions of NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 in Figure 3. The circles in this figure denote the boundaries of the proper motions such that RR Lyrae located within the circles are considered to have proper motions consistent with the globular clusters. It is worth pointing out that the proper motions of the two globular clusters, as measured in Gaia Collaboration et al. (2018b), are close to each other: the proper motions in R.A. are and , while in the decl. they are and . Therefore, it is difficult to associate these RR Lyrae with either of the globular clusters based on proper motions alone. Figure 3 reveals that this is indeed the case: proper motions of the known RR Lyrae in NGC 5024 are consistent with the proper motions of both globular clusters (left panels of Figure 3),12 and a similar situation holds for the RR Lyrae in NGC 5053 (right panels of Figure 3). For the five extra-tidal RR Lyrae identified in Kundu et al. (2019), their proper motions are fully consistent with either NGC 5024 or NGC 5053 (middle panels of Figure 3). This explains why Kundu et al. (2019) would include the four RR Lyrae from NGC 5053 as the extra-tidal RR Lyrae for NGC 5024 based on the proper-motion analysis.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageFinally, we comment on the only extra-tidal RR Lyrae of NGC 5024, V48, which is located 1281 away from NGC 5024. In Kundu et al. (2019), the adopted tidal radius of NGC 5024 is 1837, hence two-thirds of it is 1225 which puts V48 at a borderline to be considered an extra-tidal RR Lyrae. In contrast, two-thirds of the tidal radius adopted in this work is 1520, then V48 will no longer be an extra-tidal RR Lyrae of NGC 5024. The cutoff of two-thirds of the tidal radius was based on the criterion defined in Kundu et al. (2019), at which the authors did not elaborate the reason for adopting such cutoff radius (also, see the discussion in Section 4). Other tidal radii, in arcminutes, of NGC 5024 that can be found in the literature range from 14.79 ± 7.19 (Jordi & Grebel 2010), 16.25 (McLaughlin & van der Marel 2005), 16.91 (Kharchenko et al. 2013), 21.85 (Peterson & King 1975), 21.87 ± 0.53 (Lehmann & Scholz 1997), and 22.48 (Trager et al. 1995).13 Therefore, depending on the adopted tidal radius, V48 could be either an extra-tidal RR Lyrae or not.
2.2. Group B: Other Known RR Lyrae in the Vicinity
For the remaining 22 RR Lyrae, 17 and 5 of them are known RR Lyrae from the VSX and GaiaDR2RRL catalogs, respectively. Among the five RR Lyrae from the GaiaDR2RRL catalog, three of them are located within 2'of the center of NGC 5024.14 Two of them have G > 19.7 mag hence they could be the background stars, and the RR Lyrae with the Gaia DR2 ID of 3938022017256004352 has a G-band magnitude of 16.538 ± 0.001 mag. This RR Lyrae could be a new member of NGC 5024, but no proper-motion information available in the Gaia DR2 main catalog. Nevertheless, we excluded these three RR Lyrae in this work. The locations of other 19 RR Lyrae with respect to NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 are shown in Figure 4. These RR Lyrae were further grouped into four subgroups based on their locations relative to the two globular clusters, as summarized in Table 2. The comparisons of their proper motions to those of NGC 5024 and NGC 5053, as well as their positions on the CMD, are displayed in Figure 5. Two RR Lyrae, PS1-3PI J131315.63 + 181410.1 (or PS1-3PI J131315 in Table 2) and Gaia DR2 ID 3938041533584189184, were found to be misidentified RR Lyrae (see Appendix B for more details).
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageDownload figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageTable 2. Known RR Lyrae in the Vicinity of NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 (Group B)
VSX Name | αJ2000 | δJ2000 | Δ5024 | Δ5053 | Gaia DR2 ID | G | Bp − Rp | pmRA | pmDE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Within the 3rt of both clusters (filled plus signs in Figure 5) | |||||||||
PS1-3PI J131558a | 198.99365 | 17.59436 | 55.55 | 9.32 | 3938679383472421760 | 20.073 | 0.475 | −1.748 ± 1.410 | −0.104 ± 1.038 |
RS Com | 198.66493 | 17.19691 | 63.35 | 39.62 | 3936953979146081792 | 15.564 | 0.530 | −6.653 ± 0.096 | −3.796 ± 0.068 |
Within the 3rt of NGC 5024 (filled squares in Figure 5) | |||||||||
PS1-3PI J131315a | 198.31514 | 18.23614 | 6.33 | 55.74 | 3938773288637827712 | −99.99 | −99.99 | −1.586 ± 1.901 | −1.337 ± 1.094 |
⋯ | 198.02127 | 18.42893 | 19.66 | 76.08 | 3938041533584189184 | −99.99b | −99.99b | −99.99 | −99.99 |
CSS J131054a | 197.72836 | 18.41797 | 32.28 | 89.96 | 3938090393134378752 | −99.99 | −99.99 | 6.555 ± 0.057 | −7.511 ± 0.038 |
RR Com | 197.64986 | 18.01958 | 34.28 | 85.72 | 3938004631227430144 | 16.318 | 0.490 | 0.347 ± 0.123 | −2.788 ± 0.090 |
CSS J130829a | 197.12431 | 17.98337 | 64.05 | 114.84 | 3937956660735121664 | 18.714 | 0.503 | −1.405 ± 0.576 | −0.072 ± 0.475 |
CSS J130923a | 197.34989 | 18.83797 | 64.22 | 121.45 | 3938306378448284672 | 16.499 | 0.535 | −3.361 ± 0.131 | −0.028 ± 0.088 |
Within the 3rt of NGC 5053 (filled circles in Figure 5) | |||||||||
OP Com | 199.55205 | 17.36733 | 89.52 | 32.10 | 3938423098479656960 | 16.716 | 0.485 | −1.960 ± 0.149 | −2.672 ± 0.097 |
OQ Com | 199.67464 | 17.75669 | 86.06 | 32.28 | 3938510097337185280 | 14.969 | 0.572 | 1.007 ± 0.079 | −5.827 ± 0.067 |
RT Com | 199.22275 | 17.10860 | 85.22 | 36.05 | 3936916973707946752 | 14.016 | 0.550 | 5.249 ± 0.053 | −13.564 ± 0.042 |
Not within the 3rt of either clusters (filled triangles in Figure 5) | |||||||||
Z Com | 197.07614 | 18.54048 | 69.41 | 126.61 | 3938269613528220672 | 13.735 | 0.513 | 3.182 ± 0.049 | −19.942 ± 0.046 |
RV Com | 199.47250 | 18.67250 | 76.92 | 61.83 | 3938893311498825984 | 14.031 | 0.457 | −11.983 ± 0.058 | −5.711 ± 0.050 |
BG Com | 199.93618 | 18.30730 | 97.57 | 59.44 | 3938639839708973056 | 15.854 | 0.480 | −5.195 ± 0.100 | −1.275 ± 0.080 |
CSS J131532a | 198.88418 | 19.22940 | 73.73 | 92.67 | 3939689422341157120 | 18.364 | 0.524 | −1.381 ± 0.461 | −0.808 ± 0.393 |
CSS J131445a | 198.68950 | 16.51934 | 102.37 | 74.90 | 3936774724391121280 | 15.510 | 0.483 | −4.652 ± 0.089 | −3.667 ± 0.062 |
CSS J132009a | 200.03928 | 17.48136 | 111.25 | 54.59 | 3938440072190455296 | 18.686 | 0.525 | −1.244 ± 0.496 | −1.007 ± 0.430 |
⋯ | 199.83771 | 17.06256 | 113.36 | 56.45 | 3746246947188342784 | 18.432 | 0.327 | −2.256 ± 0.461 | −0.267 ± 0.365 |
PS1-3PI J131801a | 199.50486 | 16.81444 | 109.17 | 57.70 | 3936893742228790528 | 18.218 | 0.484 | −1.921 ± 0.366 | −0.664 ± 0.286 |
Notes. The meanings of each column are same as in Table 1.
aPS1-3PI J131558 = PS1-3PI J131558.47 + 173539.6; PS1-3PI J131315 = PS1-3PI J131315.63 + 181410.1; PS1-3PI J131801 = PS1-3PI J131801.16 + 164851.9; CSS J130829 = CSS J130829.7 + 175900; CSS J130923 = CSS J130923.9 + 185016; CSS J131054 = CSS J131054.8 + 182504; CSS J131532 = CSS J131532.1 + 191346; CSS J131445 = CSS J131445.4 + 163109; CSS J132009 = CSS J132009.3 + 172853. bThe Gaia DR2 main catalog listed G = 19.480 ± 0.020 and BP − Rp = 1.392 for this RR Lyrae.Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
Seven RR Lyrae appeared to have proper motions consistent with either of the globular clusters as shown in the left panels of Figure 5, and they also satisfied the proper-motion criterion given in Kundu et al. (2019). However, these seven RR Lyrae are all fainter than G ∼ 18 mag in the CMD,15 as presented in right panel of Figure 5, hence they most likely belong to the background population of RR Lyrae in the Galactic halo. In contrast, three RR Lyrae are located in the magnitude range of 16.0 < G < 17.5, enclosing the expected magnitudes of the horizontal branch stars in NGC 5024 and NGC 5053. CSS J130923.9 + 185016 is located right on top of the horizontal branch of NGC 5053 but it is closer to NGC 5024 on the sky. Similarly, OP Com seems to match with the horizontal branch of NGC 5024 but it is located near NGC 5053. Proper motions of these two RR Lyrae exhibit a large deviation relative to either of the globular clusters and hence they do not appear to be members or extra-tidal RR Lyrae of these two clusters. The most promising candidate of the extra-tidal RR Lyrae is RR Com, which is located within 3rt of NGC 5024. The mean brightness of this RR Lyrae is G = 16.3176 ± 0.0002 mag, about ∼0.4 mag brighter than the horizontal branch of NGC 5024 (see upper right panel of Figure 5), and similar to the RR Lyrae V60 in NGC 5024 (with G = 16.3854 ± 0.0009 mag). In fact, RR Com was picked up in Kundu et al. (2019) as a potential extra-tidal RR Lyrae for NGC 5024 but rejected based on the proper-motion criterion.
3. Searching for New RR Lyrae
Since none of the known RR Lyrae within our search area of ∼8 deg2 were found to be definitive extra-tidal RR Lyrae of NGC 5024 and NGC 5053, we attempt to search for new RR Lyrae within the same area in this section. Given that RR Lyrae are high-amplitude variable stars, and the expected extra-tidal RR Lyrae would have similar brightness as those in the NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 with G ∼ 16.7 mag (the averaged value for RR Lyrae listed in Table 1), any such new extra-tidal RR Lyrae should already have been detected from time domain all-sky surveys such as Pan-STARRS1 (as done in Sesar et al. 2017) or Gaia (Clementini et al. 2019) that can reach to a depth fainter than ∼20 mag. The fact that we did not find any extra-tidal RR Lyrae, based on the known RR Lyrae, in the previous sections indicates that most likely we will not find any new RR Lyrae around G ∼ 16.7 mag located within our search area.
3.1. Selecting Candidates from Gaia DR2
We began the search for new RR Lyrae using the Gaia DR2 main catalog. We selected 664 stars located within the search area of ∼8 deg2 defined in the previous section and that satisfied the conditions 16.0 < G < 17.5 and 0.2 < (BP − RP) < 0.8 (roughly bracketed the positions of expected RR Lyrae in the CMD). We further excluded those stars located within two-thirds of the tidal radius of either globular clusters, leaving 291 stars in our sample. Finally, we applied the proper-motion criterion from Kundu et al. (2019) in either the R.A. or decl. directions, but not both, leaving 79 stars (including RR Com) to be examined with ZTF light curves in the next subsection. If we enforce the Kundu et al. (2019) proper-motion criterion to be satisfied in both directions, this would leave only nine stars in the sample.
3.2. Light Curves from ZTF
The ZTF (operating 2018–2020) is a dedicated time domain wide-field synoptic sky survey aimed to explore the transient universe. ZTF utilizes the Palomar 48 inch Samuel Oschin Schmidt telescope, together with a new mosaic CCD camera, that provides a field of view of 47 squared degrees to observe the northern sky in customized gri filters. Further details regarding ZTF can be found in Bellm et al. (2019), Graham et al. (2019), and Dekany et al. (2020) and will not be repeated here. Imaging data taken from ZTF were processed with a dedicated reduction pipeline, as detailed in Masci et al. (2019); the final data products included reduced images and catalogs based on point-spread function (PSF) photometry.
Light curves of the 79 stars identified in the previous subsection were extracted from the ZTF's PSF catalogs spanning from 2017 November16 to 2020 January. The number of data points per light curves, in the format of minimum/median/maximum, are 13/110/202 in the g band, 35/172/318 in the r band, and 5/39/78 in the i band. Following Yang & Sarajedini (2010), we calculated the values for each star relative to a constant model using all gri-band data:
where . To guard against outliers, we also calculated the median absolute deviation (MAD) values for the same set of light curves,
where is the median value of array x. The left panel of Figure 6 presents the values of MAD versus , where some large values of seem to be affected by outliers. The product of these two values, , appears to be a good metric to distinguish between variable and nonvariable stars, as shown in bottom right panel of Figure 6. The only known RR Lyrae among the 79 stars, RR Com, clearly stands out in this figure. Light curves for the two stars (including RR Com) with the highest values of s are presented in Figure 7. Undoubtedly, the star in the right panel of Figure 7 is not a RR Lyrae (nor a variable star of any sort).
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageDownload figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageVisually inspecting these light curves reveals that those light curves with s < 0.17 do not shown signs of variability. There were 65 stars with s < 0.17 in the sample, including the nine stars that satisfied the proper-motion criterion in Kundu et al. (2019) mentioned in the previous subsection. A few example light curves are presented in Figure 8. We searched for a periodicity on the rest of stars with s > 0.17, excluding RR Com, using the Lomb–Scargle periodogram implemented in the Astropy package (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013, 2018). The periodicity search was done on the r-band light curves (as this band has the most data points) within the period range of 0.2–1.2 days, appropriate for the possible periods of RR Lyrae. Among about a dozen stars with s > 0.17, the majority of them do not show any periodicity, and there were four stars displaying some variability but without a convincing periodicity. Their ZTF light curves are displayed in Figure 9, and none of them are RR Lyrae.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageDownload figure:
Standard image High-resolution image4. Conclusion
In this work, we re-evaluated the claim of Kundu et al. (2019) that there are five extra-tidal RR Lyrae associated with globular cluster NGC 5024. Four of these RR Lyrae were known members of a nearby globular cluster NGC 5053. The remaining extra-tidal RR Lyrae, V48 of NGC 5024, could either be an extra-tidal RR Lyrae of NGC 5024 or not—depending on the adopted tidal radius of NGC 5024. One of the criteria employed in Kundu et al. (2019) is such that extra-tidal RR Lyrae should be located outside the two-thirds of the tidal radius for a given globular cluster. Other similar work in literature, however, adopted the criterion of one tidal radius to select the extra-tidal RR Lyrae (Kunder et al. 2018; Minniti et al. 2018). If the criterion of one tidal radius is adopted, then V48 will no longer be an extra-tidal RR Lyrae of NGC 5024.
Besides the RR Lyrae that were known members of NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 from Clement's Catalog, we compiled a list of known RR Lyrae within an area of ∼8 deg2 from the literature. Using the similar selection criteria as in Kundu et al. (2019), together with the Gaia DR2 data, none of these known RR Lyrae were found to be extra-tidal RR Lyrae of either globular clusters. Finally, using Gaia DR2 data, we selected stars within our search area but outside the two-thirds of the tidal radii of both globular clusters that fall in the range of 16.0 < G < 17.5 and 0.2 < (BP − RP) < 0.8, as well as satisfied the proper-motion criterion from Kundu et al. (2019) in either direction. A further variability and periodicity analysis of these stars with the ZTF light curves data revealed that none of them were new RR Lyrae. Therefore, we have concluded there were no extra-tidal RR Lyrae for either NGC 5024 or NGC 5053 within our search area of ∼8 deg2 that covered both globular clusters.
We thank the useful discussions and comments from T. de Boer, P. Mroz, and an anonymous referee which improved the manuscript. We thank the funding from Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan) under the contract 107-2119-M-008-014-MY2, 107-2119-M-008-012, and 108-2628-M-007-005-RSP.
Based on observations obtained with the Samuel Oschin Telescope 48 inch and the 60 inch Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part of the Zwicky Transient Facility project. Major funding has been provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation under grant No. AST-1440341 and by the ZTF partner institutions: the California Institute of Technology, the Oskar Klein Centre, the Weizmann Institute of Science, the University of Maryland, the University of Washington, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and the TANGO Program of the University System of Taiwan.
This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.
This research has made use of the SIMBAD database and the VizieR catalog access tool, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. This research has made use of the International Variable Star Index (VSX) database, operated at AAVSO, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
This research made use of Astropy,17 a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013, 2018).
Facilities: Gaia - , PO:1.2 m. -
Software: Astropy package (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013, 2018), Astroquery (Ginsburg et al. 2019).
Appendix A: Constructing the Proper Motion and CMDs for the Clusters
We utilize the proper motions and color–magnitude diagrams (PMD and CMD, respectively) to evaluate the probable membership of the selected RR Lyrae and candidates (as described in Section 2) in the vicinity of the two globular clusters studied in this work. More precisely, these diagrams, constructed using the data in Gaia DR2 catalog, are used to reject RR Lyrae and candidates that are obviously not members of the clusters. Sources within 1 tidal radius of each globular cluster were queried from the Gaia DR2 main catalog (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018a), and the corresponding PMD and CMD are shown in Figure A1. As can be seen from the figure, there are large scatters in the PMD and many outliers in the CMD, which are probably foreground or background sources. Since our goal is not to establish the cluster membership of each Gaia source, but construct a clean CMD to be compared with the RR Lyrae and candidates, we adopted a simple criterion to select the Gaia sources. For each Gaia source, we calculated ΔPM = [(pmRA − pmRAc)2 + (pmDE − pmDEc]2)1/2, where pmRA and pmDE are proper motions for each source in R.A. and decl., respectively, and the subscript c represents the measured proper motions of the clusters (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018b). Only those sources with ΔPM < pmT/2 are kept as the clean sample, where pmT is the quadrature sum of pmRAc and pmDEc. The clean CMDs of NGC 5024 and NGC 5053 are presented in Section 2.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageAppendix B: Light Curves for Two Misidentified RR Lyrae
We have examined the ZTF light curves for RR Lyrae listed in Table 2, and found that two of them do not display RR-Lyrae-like light curves. These two putative RR Lyrae are PS1-3PI J131315.63 + 181410.1 (abbreviated as PS1-3PI J131315) and Gaia DR2 ID 3938041533584189184, but we classify them as non-RR Lyrae. Other RR Lyrae in Table 2 display the light-curve shapes expected for ab- or c-type RR Lyrae after folding the ZTF light curves with their published periods.
- PS1-3PI J131315. This star is identified in Sesar et al. (2017) with final classification scores of S3ab=0.93 and S3c=0.02, suggesting this star has a high probability of being an ab-type RR Lyrae. The period of PS1-3PI J131315 is found to be 0.6386368 days (Sesar et al. 2017). However the Lomb–Scargle periodogram applied to its r-band ZTF light curve did not reveal any significant peak between 0.2 and 1.2 days (see left panel of Figure B1). The folded ZTF light curves for this star, either with the published period or the best period (corresponding to the highest peak in the Lomb–Scargle periodogram), as shown in right panel of Figure B1, do not resemble those of ab-type RR Lyrae.
- 3938041533584189184. This star is identified in Rimoldini et al. (2019) as an ab-type RR Lyrae with a best_class_score=0.6279, but there is no period found for this star. We ran the Lomb–Scargle periodogram on the ZTF r-band light curve for this star, and no significant peak was found between 0.2 and 1.2 days. The Lomb–Scargle periodogram and the folded ZTF light curves with the best period are displayed in Figure B2. Clearly, this star is not an ab-type RR Lyrae.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageDownload figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageFootnotes
- 8
In the case of NGC 5053, even though the Wilson model is a better fit to its number density (de Boer et al. 2019), the derived tidal radius from the Wilson model, 181 ± 15, is in good agreement with the value based on the SPES model.
- 9
We thank T. de Boer for verifying this.
- 10
The scores have a value between 0 and 1, where 1 represents the star having a very high probability of being an RR Lyrae, and 0 if the star is not classified as an RR Lyrae. These scores have an associated level of purity and completeness as described in Sesar et al. (2017). For example, S3ab > 0.8 implies the underlying star is an ab-type RR Lyrae with purity of 91% and completeness of 77% at ∼80 kpc.
- 11
- 12
There are few NGC 5024 RR Lyrae located outside the circles in left panels of Figure 3, indicating a possibility that they may not belong to NGC 5024. However they are all located within ∼23 from the center of NGC 5024. The investigation of their memberships with NGC 5024 is not main scope of this paper, hence we will not study them in detail further.
- 13
Values taken from Table 4 of Lehmann & Scholz (1997).
- 14
The Gaia DR2 ID for these three RR Lyrae are: 3938022017256004352, 3938022085975309952, and 3938022463930328960.
- 15
In the case of PS1-3PI J131315.63 + 181410.1, there is no G-band intensity mean magnitude given in the gaiadr2.vary_rrlyrae table. Nevertheless the Gaia DR2 main catalog listed a value of G = 20.222 ± 0.007 mag for this RR Lyrae.
- 16
Part of the data were taken during the ZTF commissioning phase from 2017 November to 2018 March.
- 17